The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.
Catcher-Kendall has been one of the few moves over the last two years that has seemed to have panned out. Rivera is just a backup, but Kendall, and the way he handles the pitching staff has been a revelation.
First Base-Prince. Great player. Should never have had his contract renewed. Melvin cost the Crew any chance of keeping him long term by insulting him like that.
Second Base-Weeks is an absolute bust. For a long time, all he could do is hit, but not field. Now, he is just the opposite. The man is junk. Everytime he is up, look for the slider outside in the dirt. WHIFF!!!! What the hell happened to him? Anytime they want to send him down and call up Iribarren would be fine with me.
Shortstop-I love Hardy. He is a great fielder and an absolute gamer. But why hit him seventh.....in front of the pitcher. He made the all-star team as a two hole hitter. Why mess with him Yost?
Third Base-Hall is a good fielder, with great power, and no clue at the plate. He might actually aggravate me more than Weeks.
Right Field-Hart is a beast....he should be hitting lead off.
Center Field-Cameron is solid.
Left Field-They better not mess with Braun. One of the best young players in the game.
Starting Pitching-When Sheets is healthy, he is a monster. Same goes for Gallardo. Suppan is an overpayed journeyman, V and Parra are five inning bullpen killers. Bush just plain sucks.
Relief Pitching-Turnbow, finally gone. Gagne, stinks. Mota, average. Riske, average. Shouse, great situational along with Stetter. The bullpen has been a huge disappointment. 10 million for Gagne might be the worst signing in Melvins history, next to the money Suppan and Gagne got.
Manager-Ned should have lost his job after they folded last year. For some reason, at least every game the guy makes a questionable decision. I have no problem with gambling on the basepaths, but Ned kills his pen every year, and this year shuffled around a line up that was one of the top offenses in the NL last year. Why? Because he wants to look like a genius. Does anyone think that it is odd that the Crew gets killed by the Cards every year. I don't. Ned gets outmanaged by LaRussa every single game.
GM-Melvin has assembled great talent through the draft, but almost all of his free agents have flopped. For the money the Crew spent on Turnbow, Suppan, and Gag Me, they could have payed for Johan Santana.
The bottom line, if this team keeps underachieving, both Yost and Melvin need to go. They have both stood by Weeks, Gagne, Turnbow, and Suppan, and those guys are where most of the teams salary is tied up. It is time for the Crew to either win, or get rid of the management. I for one, a fan since 1980, have been to at least 100 games through the years. Have bought jerseys, hats, and other memorabilia. Payed for the MLB package so I could watch them in Washington. It is time to win now!! No more waiting!! GET IT DONE!!
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 1:18 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.They probably will get 80 wins, it'll just take em a while, and it wontt be so easy. Everything else was fine.
|
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 1:19 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.I like what your saying. 100% true
|
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 1:26 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.Without Gallardo, the Brewers stand no chance at beating the Cubs for the division. |
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 9:37 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.Jason Kendall - the Brewers pitching is terrible, how is Kendall's work a revelation? Prince's contract - do you know how these things work? I'm guessing you don't by your comment. It's doubtful the Brewers could have doen anything with Prince's contract at this time. Scott Boras typically does not allow his players to be bought out. Rickie Weeks - to call him a bust at his age is a bit premature, why give up on a guy who is only 26 years old and has all the physical tools to succeed? As usual, the backup quarterback or the next big thing in the minors is always everyone's favorite. Remember how great Ron Belliard was going to be? JJ Hardy - I'll give you a little on this one, but if Hardy doesn't hit in front of the pitcher who will? You think Hall, Weeks or Cameron have the discipline to bat in front of the pitcher? I don't. Bill Hall - terrible plate discipline, never hit for a high average but there is value in a player that can move from the infield to the outfield and back to the infield again. You need one of these versatile guys on the roster. Sure I wish he was better at the plate but his defensive flexibility shouldn't be overlooked. Cory Hart - is in fact a beast, while I wouldn't be opposed to having him leadoff there is value having him part of the three headed monster with Braun and Fielder. Mike Cameron - He's a .240 career hitter. Unless you're just disregarding his career stats and going to use his one week with the Brewers to base your opinion. He has power, he has speed, great glove, takes some walks, has a low batting average and strikes out a ton. Let's see how this Cameron thing works out, I like the signing but it's too early to tell. Ryan Braun - incredible rookie season, but let's not let him off the hook here. He is falling well short of expectations to this point, why does he get a free pass? He needs to pick things up. Starting Pitching - not very good. Gallardo is done, Sheets is a pitch away from the 15 day DL, Suppan is Suppan, he's a 4.50 era pitcher who can eat innings, he's no more than a #3 starter on just about any team. Parra and Villanueva do not appear ready to take the ball every 5 days. They are a bullpen drain and for a weak bullpen that spells disaster. Relief Pitching - Not good. Gagne was a one year deal for 10 million, I'd still rather do that deal then pay Cordero 47 million over 4 years. If the Brewers didn't take the chance on Gagne who would have closed for this team? The free agent market for closers was terrible, they took a chance on a guy with no long term commitment. He still has time to turn it around. I agree that the rest of the bullpen is pretty average, which when they have to come into games in the 6th inning it makes them even worse. Ned Yost - after you point out how bad Weeks, Hall the starting pitching and the bullpen is you proceed to call for Yost's head. How is that? When a team has this many weaknesses what do you expect? This team is not that talented nor are they underachieving so much that they need to overhaul the front office. Why does every Brewer fan ignore the lack of pitching on this team and keep talking about the talent the team has. There's more to a baseball team than being able to hit home runs. The bullpen needs to be better, the starting pitching needs to be better, and the offense needs some consistency, until that happens it doesn't matter who the manager is. When the starters only go 5 innings you can't help but overuse a bullpen, and when you have to use an average bullpen too often it gets even worse. The bottom line is that this team isn't nearly as talented as many would like to believe. They are probably about a .500 team, not because they're underachieving, but because that's where their talent level will put them.
|
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 11:28 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.Excellent analysis SBeach - most of which I agree with. However, I disagree with your bottom line conclusion that the Brewers are underachievers Your thread title and analysis I think comes to the correct conclusion that Milw is avaerage at best and achieving right about where they should based on their talent, field mangement and front office management. I think there is definitely young core talent e.g. Fielder, Braun, Sheets (when haealthy), Gallardo, but they have filled in the roster with a bunch of good (Hart) to fair (Kendall, Hall, Weeks, Suppan) to poor (Turnbow, Capuano, Bush) players who cannot consistently get the job done. Until they get upgrades at multiple positions, I think they will continue to finish middle of the pack. |
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 12:36 pm
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.I totally agree with most of the things you said. |
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 2:57 pm
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.Rickie Weeks - to call him a bust at his age is a bit premature, why give up on a guy who is only 26 years old and has all the physical tools to succeed? As usual, the backup quarterback or the next big thing in the minors is always everyone's favorite. Remember how great Ron Belliard was going to be? |
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 5:06 pm
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.Ron Belliard never had half the tools of Rickie Weeks, not even close. I'm not saying Rickie Weeks performance is good, it's not, it's not even acceptable. You called him a bust which at the age of 26 the skills to hit 20 HR's and steal 20 bases you're jumping the gun. Am I getting sick of Rickie's performance? Sure, but I'm not ready to call him a bust. He's 26, Since when did 26 years old become the do or die age for a baseball player? As for the Fielder contract - I thought you were suggesting the Brewers were at fault for not signing him to a long term contract. In that case Boras would have everything to do with it as he typicaly does not allow teams to buy out arbitratrion years. In either case Prince is going to cash in whether he makes 10 grand this year or 900,000. Don't act like the Brewers were going to get some kind of hometeam discount and that this contract ruined that possibility. As for Mike Cameron, you got me, shame on me to diss his .250 average by saying it was .240. That one more hit in 100 at bats makes all the difference.
|
|
|
Posted on: May 7, 2008 5:41 pm
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.He's 26, Since when did 26 years old become the do or die age for a baseball player? |
|
|
Posted on: May 9, 2008 11:50 am
The Brewers look no better than an 80 win team.So if you're 26 years old and haven't improved at the expected pace you're not going to? I'm not saying you can't hate Rickie Weeks, I'm saying that 26 years old is too early to call a guy a bust. Of course I want him to improve, who wouldn't? The difference here is that you've called him a bust and given up on a 26 year old player that has the ability to hit 25 hr's and steal 25 bases, I not ready to call him a bust yet, nor am I ready to give up on him. The Brewers offered Cordero a 4 year 42 million dollar contract, he signed with the Reds for 4 years at 46 million. I'd hardly call that nickel and diming. Besides, I'd much rather experiment with Gagne for one year at 10 million then be stuck with Cordero for 4 years at 47 million. You sign Cordero for that kind of money and one of the position players doesn't get signed in the next few years...Cordero wasn't worth that kind of money, he benefited from the lack of options. He was the best closer available this past offseason, that doesn't mean he's worth what he got. Paying Cordero 47 million over the next four years would have been absolutely stupid. Did Prince win ROY and an MVP? Why should he get what Ryan Howard got? Maybe the renewal comes into play maybe it doesn't, I just think you're making a big deal about nothing. When it comes to contract time the only thing that's going to matter is who is offering what at that moment. No one's getting a discount and he's not going to play for someone for less because of what happened a few years ago. If the Brewers meet his number, he'll be a Brewer, if not, he'll play somewhere else. I never said Cameron wasn't worth it, I said I liked the signing...he has power, he has speed, he has a great glove and his OBP is good, but he doesn't hit for a high average and he strikes out too much. I repeat, I like the signing he's just got some flaws which I'm willing to live with. |










