powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Game 7 Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Game 7


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Game 7
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:May 19, 2007

April 30, 2008 9:33 pm
You're 7 game conspiracy theory is about as bad as any comment I've seen on the board. Even worse than some of Andy's comments. And that's bad....So let me get this right. The NBA makes more money on  7 game sereis, but are only interested in fixing games when the CAVS are involved. They don't care that the Lakers Nuggets were a sweep or the marquee matchup of round 1, phx/S.A went 5. But when the Cavs are involved Stern has an agenda? So that's the theory your sticking with?

Game 7
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:May 19, 2007

April 30, 2008 9:34 pm
But wait! Last years finals was a SWEEP. How did Stern let that happen, and lose all that money?

Game 7
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 26, 2007

April 30, 2008 9:55 pm
Last year's Spurs were twice as good as last year's Cavs...  The officials can only control a game so much without being blatantly obvious...

Game 7
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 26, 2007

April 30, 2008 9:59 pm

Haha, when did I ever say they "only affect games that the Cavs are involved in"..?  That is absolutely false...  They control every series, which is exactly why the Hawks are tied at 2-2 with the Celtics right now...  the Hawks have been playing good ball, but it doesn't hurt when every call goes your way...  And as for your Lakers-Nuggets series, the Lakers were just clearly the superior team and Denver was a horrible matchup for LA...  Denver plays absolutely NO defense so they had zero chance of winning this game...

 

Once again, there is no conspiracy against the Cavs...  If the Cavs were down 3-1, they would be getting the same preferential treatment...  But if you honestly think that the NBA likes 4 game sweeps rather than 6 or 7 game series, you are a very ignorant being...


Game 7
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Apr 26, 2007

April 30, 2008 10:01 pm
And if you watched games 4 and 5 of the Spurs-Suns series this year, you would know that the Suns got ALL the calls...  The Spurs were simply too good for the aging Suns (Shaq, Nash)...  If you watched gthe game, the officials put the Suns in position to win, but Nash had 3 CRUCIAL turnovers in the last couple minutes...