powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Interesting position Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Interesting position


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Interesting position
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 22, 2008

April 27, 2008 8:19 pm
These lawmakers are trying to look into something. I think the BCS is a huge overhyped joke. It creates another division of football. That is what happens when you create a separation of two groups of universities in a sport. Maybe it is better that way. Maybe the 5 non BCS Conferences should declare themselves as NCAA Real Championship Division and create their own playoff system. They could exclude the BCS Conferences and have a champion of their own.

Now that may sound a bit frivolous and who would care anyway? Well, those 5 non-BCS conferences get crap times on the TV anyway (or if your favorite team is in the MWC like BYU, my team, it is hard to get the channel even if the game is one during a decent time). Some network would pick it up and show it. It wouldn't go unnoticed by the fans who want to watch it.

Instead of whining about wanting to be included, create your own system and your own prize. Let go of wanting to be a part of the BCS. Lawmakers do have better things to do with their time and should not waste it on silly things like this.

Interesting position
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 20, 2007

April 27, 2008 8:57 pm
Many people may have the same sentiment but there are a few problems.  The first is that any educator/administrator wants the best for their kids.  The BCS conferences traditionally produce the best teams.  If you make your own league and decrease the amount you compete against BCS schools, the team suffers by not competing against high level talent.  The other problem is that if your argument is correct that it is hard to get TV time now, if they create their own league then they will get even less TV Time.  Less TV time and no BCS money drastically reduces revenue, which then hurts the quality of athlete a school can recruit.  The non-BCS schools need the money so they will stay in.  The best solution really is a playoff, somewhere between 4 and 16 teams.  It is feasible if the Big Ten and Pac Ten will suck up their tradition and participate.  The Big 12 (previously the Big 8) sucked it up when they lost their historic position in the orange bowl and have created a new tradition with the Fiesta Bowl.  No good reason to not have a playoff. 

Interesting position
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 19, 2006

April 27, 2008 10:05 pm
My biggest problem with the BCS is that the formula is designed so that teams will never take strong out of conference opponents because losses count so heavily.  As a result, we have very little knowledge of the relative strength of conferences and teams.

Interesting position
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 20, 2007

April 27, 2008 10:29 pm
That is definitely a problem which is why I lost respect for certain teams for not playing quality out of conference schedules, but the system encourages that type of scheduling.   That problem also makes it hard for a non BCS school who is good to get quality opponents in the future because teams get scared of them. 


Cheap Plug for online game here:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/signup.pl?ref=7384928


Interesting position
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 3, 2007

April 28, 2008 12:58 am
Hey, CBass, consider this:  If ALL conference champs were allowed by rule into the BCS games, under a playoff system, then first, wouldn't the likes of say, LSU, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, and Auburn all want OUT of the SEC, to go win a patsy conference?  So LSU would try to take La Tech's place in their conference, and wipe out the likes of Hawaii and Boise State every year consistently.

Second, suppose we designed a "playoff" system.  I'm certain that a team's record would be a major factor in determining who gets into the playoff.  So, WHY would a good team schedule a strong out-of-conference team?  We'd still be in the same predicament.

Finally, football, unlike basketball (i.e. March Madness) doesn't play very many games.  To really determine who's worthy to make the playoffs, you'd need more games.  This would be in addition to the playoff games as well.  So yer talkin' 'bout 20 games at least -- The NFL needs about that many, and they only have, what?  -32 teams, as compared to over 100 in college football.

So, anyone want to suggest an alternative to the BCS that would actually WORK?

Interesting position
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 7, 2007

April 28, 2008 6:24 am
While it's doubtful Abercrombie's been talking to Obama's parents unless he's been conducting seances, equal access is what he's talking about. It's not fair when certain conferences get automatic slots and other conferences have to play their way in. The current system would be fairer, if no conference got automatic berths and the BCS bowls were selected by the current system. There's little doubt the current BCS conferences would peobably get the same number of slots, but people like Abercrombie would have a leg to stand on if there were equal access. Everyone would have to play their way in. Assuming you keep the strehgth of schedule etc. Yes LSU would switch to a current non-BCS conference in the hope of getting a weaker schedule, but you can account for that and after a few years, they'd have trouble recruiting top talent to that mindset. It;s not something the current BCS conference should worry about.

Interesting position
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 24, 2007

April 28, 2008 6:27 pm
CBass, losses can't hurt that much, look how many 2 loss teams were in the conversation last year. Quality wins mean alot.


Interesting position
-
Reputation:91
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 13, 2007