powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Posada's Future Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Posada's Future


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Posada's Future
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 8, 2007

April 14, 2008 7:13 pm
Look you are comparing Hanley now with Jeter now, not Jeter then with Hanley now or Jeter now with Hanley in the future. 

You stated a definative statement that Hanley Ramirez is a better shortstop than Jeter, but statistically he is not.  Period end of case.  You can not bank of potential! 

By the way when Jeter finished his 3rd year he already had 2 WS rings and was part of arguably the best team in history. 

Posada's Future
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 2, 2008

April 15, 2008 9:22 pm

"You can not bank on* potential"

Thats what tried to say right? well, the same can be siad about you and your beliefs about how good the yankee  rookies are.

How much did the "best team in history cost"?


Posada's Future
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 8, 2007

April 15, 2008 9:49 pm
I never said the Yanks rookies were good I said that we have good young talent, I never claimed that they were the "best" at their position like you did Hanley Ramirez despite statistics that prove otherwise.


As far as the best team in history, it cost $73,963,698 2nd in the MLB to Baltimore.