powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Alabama and Kentuky missing? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Alabama and Kentuky missing?


View Message Board ·  Return to StoryViews:      


Alabama and Kentuky missing?
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 9, 2006

April 10, 2008 5:43 pm
jk

Alabama and Kentuky missing?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 27, 2006

April 10, 2008 6:03 pm
Bama will be good only if Hendrix and Steele return.  In that case Bama will be anywhere from a 4 seed to a 7 seed in the NCAA tourney.  The core we have back is the 2006 team that nearly knocked off UCLA in the 2nd round when UCLA made it to the Finals.  Except we don't have Jean Felix and Jemario Davidson (#2 and #3 scorers from that team).  So actually the core is that of the early 07 team which was poised for a top 15 ranking until Davidson had his issues and Steele went down with the bad knees.  Bama will have the best starting 5 next year in the SEC, but the bench is still not that great.  Hollinger, Jemison, and one of either Torrence or Coleman could be good next year.  The incoming class we got was a top 10 national ranking with Green, the other Steele, and Mitchell.  I see us winning 25 games, but losing games we shouldn't due to coaching.  Luckily Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, and AU should be down next year and MSU could lose Gordon (who is the best player in the SEC, maybe better than Ron Steele).   

Starting 5
Steele (PG and All-American), Hillman (SG-slasher), Gee (SF-slasher), Green (PF--raw but talented in the post but will play high post in the UCLA offense), Hendrix (Low post/C All-SEC and All-American candidate)
Key Bench players:
Hollinger (PG/SG---3pt specialist), Jemison(PF--hustle-type player)
Guys who could possibly take Bama to a new level if they are either better or as good as advertised:
Tony Mitchell (SF--Rodney Carney type player), Yamene Coleman (C---big body), Andrew Steele (SG---slasher).

We could be a very deep team next year, but only if Coleman and Torrence step up (Steele can't play 40 mpg again in SEC play for us to win).  But the key will be allowing Steele, Hillman, and Gee to make plays on the break and then focusing on getting the ball down low to Green and Hendrix in the half-court.  Finally who will shoot the 3 for us?  With Mykal Riley gone, we don't have a wing shooter than can shoot the 3.  Hollinger is too short to take enough 3's, and Steele is the PG and needs to create opportunities and drive the lane (though he's a 45% 3-pt shooter).