powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Who decided that the Pac-10 is that good? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Who decided that the Pac-10 is that good?


View Message BoardViews:      


Who decided that the Pac-10 is that good?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 21, 2007

March 22, 2008 1:48 pm
The Big 12 is 5-1 in tourney while the Pac 10 is 3-3. That said, I felt all year the Pac 10 was over rated. I think by close of business the Big 12 will have smoked most conferences and established themselves has more than reputible.

Who decided that the Pac-10 is that good?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 3, 2007

March 29, 2008 8:23 pm

Pac 10 is overrated but its not those teams' fault. And it is indeed a very good conference and among the best.

The P10 B12 challenge was favorable to B12 in wins, but that really doesn't tell you which is better. That was mostly about matchups.

I have felt that the three best conferences from top to bottom were the B12, ACC and P10 this year. I know the ACC was "down" but there were few bad losses for the conference collectively and there were some great non-conf wins collectively.

The Big 12 is really heavy at the top. Then some good middle teams, some average teams, then a couple of really bad teams. A typical conference. Their tops were two of the best in the nation though, and their middles were all better than a lot of people give them credit for.

Pac 10 was similar, just not as good at the top, about as bad at the bottom buit I felt their middle had the edge on the Big 12.

I have felt all year that the Big East was the most overrated conference in the land. 16 teams, and really other than Louisville and Georgetown (who again was overrated), not a lot of good middle teams. After that the drop off was pretty severe and the Big East's middle could not handle the middle of the Big 12 or the Pac 10.

Of course they are going to have a worse bottom because they just have numbers