powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Wisconsin a No. 3? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Wisconsin a No. 3?


View Message BoardViews:      


Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 10, 2006

March 16, 2008 7:12 pm
Is there no love for the Big Ten anymore? Not that Cal. State Fullerton can beat the Badgers, but Wisconsin should have easily been slated in a No. 2 spot.

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 26, 2008

March 16, 2008 7:20 pm
I disagree. Wisconsin might not even be the best three seed. Stanford played in a much tougher conference, and played some great basketball all year, except for at the very end. Wisconsin lost twice to Purdue, and to Marquette. Both teams are good, but not great. Perhaps they deserve to be the number two seed, but Georgetown gritted it out in a tougher conference. In the end, the weakness of the Big Ten doomed Wisconsin.

Wisconsin a No. 3?
+

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 16, 2008

March 16, 2008 7:24 pm
I think they should be satisfied with what they received from the committee! They were beat by what almost 30 in the big ten .. acc challenge by DUKE.. "the most overrated team you say??  The acc.. big ten challenge was a long time ago but the acc only got 4 teams in and i thought the big ten got 6 teams in im not for sure that is accurate but i believe its close.. i think that is saying there is LOVE for the BIG TEN.  At least they get to DANCE> >

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:81
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 17, 2008

March 17, 2008 12:55 pm
The Big Ten and ACC only got 4 teams in.  The Big ten doesnt deserve that much love, look who was playing in the second of the semifinal games- Minnesota vs Illinois.  they only have four ranked teams and three of them are in the twentys.  I have a problem with texas ahead of the badgers.  I know they play in a tougher conference but the Badgers beat them in Texas and have a better record.

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:81
Level:All-Star
Since:Jan 10, 2007

March 17, 2008 5:19 pm
Brother - I'm as big a Badger fan as you'll find, but Texas deserves their spot ahead of the Badgers.  Regardless of the head to head matchup, Texas has a stronger body of work than the Badgers.  No fault of Bucky, Texas just plays in a deeper conference and had wins against Tennessee and on the road at UCLA.  That's pretty impressive stuff.

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:53
Level:Pro
Since:Feb 4, 2007

March 16, 2008 7:25 pm
Wisconsin should be a 1 seed.  Dussdorf is an idiot.     Big 10 is the toughest conference.     Seth Greenberg and bob Knight can lik my sak.

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 9, 2007

March 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Georgia won the SEC conference, the SEC got a 2 and a 4 seed.... Is the Big 10 a dominant conference this year? No. Does that mean Wisconsin should be a 3 seed? No. Wisconsin should have been a 2 seed. I am a huge Bruce Pearl fan, but when Georgia wins your conference tourney, you should not be allowed a 2 seed.


Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:77
Level:Pro
Since:Mar 12, 2008

March 16, 2008 7:42 pm
its not about how you play its how fast you can get on your knees for the commitee who gives a crap that duke beat us we beat texas an texas beat ucla so does that mean we deserve a 1 seed no so shut up about this duke beat you duke cant even beat clemson so does that mean clemson deserves a 2 seed exactly my point duke nor georgetown won thier conference tourney and duke didnt even win the regular season title. there are reasons these pathetic things happen but thats fine we will go the the final four frm the position we are in another example is arizone gettin in over illinois state and ohio state its all about the storiethat they will bring TV lute olson returning and how when zona loses he will be the missing link this is getting to be about as bad as the BCS

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-
Reputation:58
Level:Pro
Since:Sep 18, 2006

March 16, 2008 7:45 pm
Aaaaaaaaaaaaand, breathe out.

Hi, my name is comma, this is my friend period.  Have we met?

Wisconsin a No. 3?
-