|
Just look at politics these days
Politics and coaching are similar in that they are both highly competitive environments. Information is power, and the ability to manage it can determine success. And coaches are paid to succeed. We all know that competitiors will use any information against you that they possibly can. I don't condone a coach lying about an interview for another job, but I can understand why he might do it. Politicians are no more truthful than coaches, they are just slicker. When was the last time you heard a politician answer a simple yes-or-no questions with "yes" or "no"?
Q: "Did you interview for the Auburn job?"
Petrino: "No."
Same question to a Politician: "I'm gonna look you straight in the eye, and tell you that nothing is more important to me than taking Louisville to the pinnacle of college football. That is my number one priority. Anything contrary to that purpose is hogwash. Anything said otherwise is just rumor."
Personally, I don't think Petrino handled the Atlanta situation in the best way. But it was a terrible fit, and I think he realized that he was not the guy to get it turned around. He probably should have finished the season and resigned. He could afford it, and I doubt he would have been unemployed for long. Of course, I speculate about this not knowing all the pieces.
I'll criticize Petrino, but I won't call him a scumbag. To do so would discount all of the good things he has done, and insult those who place confience in him. He is now in a position where he can make positive contributions to the lives of his players, staff, and Arkansas fans. Perhaps that wasn't the case in Atlanta. I'm interested to see what he can do.
|