Obama for President

Had 0-bama been what this country really needs in a president, he would not have his absurd stated foreign policy goal of talking to thugs and terrorist supporters without pre-condition

Toxicshock,

Wow, thats spinning 101 but nice story as thats what it is.  Per your above comment what about Reagan appeasing to Iran, Rumsfeld appeasing to Sadaam, and Bush himself appeasing to N. Korea.  Bush really didn't think about his comments before he said him, as his s**t doesn't smell like roses.

You mean like Pennsylvania?  West Virginia?  Obama is bloodied.  Hillary took him to the woodshed.  And he cannot recover.

Sorry, Dems, you shot yourself in the foot here.

I'd give Hillary a shot, an outside shot.

But Obama?  Ok, the black vote and the under 25 vote.  That's the best you can do. 

The landslide will be along Dukakis levels.

The whole Hope & Change mantra is over.  That dog don't hunt anymore.

Obama has alienated Christians, gun-owners, Joe 6-pack.  He's got some of the Pinot Noir/Chardonnay and Brie set.

He wont have the military vote.  No Catholics.  No Blue collar workers.  The Hillary supporters just hate him and will vote McCain or stay home.

I'd say he has no chance if you look at the demographics.  The Hate America approach will only work on about 33% of the people tops.  And that wont get it done.

Bush's appeasement comments honored ailing Israeli leader Sharon. What the "outraged" Democrats and mainstream media are completely ignoring in Bush's "appeasement" words used in the Knesset speech is that they addressed concerns originally raised by Ariel Sharon.

Shorlty after 9/11, then Israeli Prime Minister Sharon warned the United States not to "appease the Arabs at Israel's expense."

0-bama hears this and says: " Bush says I am an appeaser."

Nowwhere in Bush's speech did he mention Democrats or 0-bama. Yet, 0-bama that "brilliant" Harvardite, said Bush called him and Democrats appeasers.

B-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a

Since you want to take the case to the extreme we have to do it on the other side as well. Suppose a man is found out at the school to be into beastiality.. according to the logic in here it's not a choice who/what he is attracted to, he was born that way. Does the University have the right to fire him? Far left argues for peoples freedoms.. but only when those freedoms follow their beliefs. It's funny that when it comes to religion they seem to have no trouble at all denying believers their rights.. but it's an outrage when people will not allow a woman to kill an unborn child.

I love how the homophobes play the "beastiality" card when debating this topic.  How bout we just stick to humans, ok?  I don't see how anyone is trying to take away "believers" their rights.  This is a myth, a scare tactic.  If you think Democrats want to take away you Bible, you're an idiot.  If you think they are going to take your gun away, you're an armed idiot (scary).