powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1  Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 22, 2007

May 1, 2008 7:32 pm

Between 2001 and 2002, Kansas City Chiefs' running back Priest Holmes rushed for 3,170 yards and 29 touchdowns. In two short years after coming from Baltimore, Holmes had established himself as one of the premiere running backs in the NFL, as well as putting together two of the greatest rushing seasons ever for a Kansas City Chief.

With three games left in the 2002 season, the Chiefs traveled to Mile High stadium to play the Denver Broncos in a game they eventually lost by a touchdown. After breaking off a 56-yard run in the third quarter, Priest Holmes was dragged down by Denver defenders and left the game with a bruised right hip. Holmes didn't finish the rest of the season and after a stellar 2003 season, only played in 19 games over the next four years because of injuries.

After the 2002 season, which ended with Holmes nearly being placed on injured reserve, the Chiefs' first move in the 2003 draft was to draft Penn St. running back Larry Johnson with the 27th overall pick.

At the time, it was deemed a curious pick by the experts. Priest Holmes had just had two of the greatest rushing seasons in franchise history and there were plenty of arguments that improving a swiss cheese defense should have been priority #1, considering the squad ended 2002 ranked last in total defense, second to last in pass defense and 24th overall in rush defense.

Thankfully, and this is a rarity out of the Dick Vermeil coaching years in the draft, the Chiefs knew what they were doing (or got lucky). As I mentioned before, Priest Holmes' skills quickly eroded after a number of serious injuries and Larry Johnson was able to fill in and absolutely dominated. 50 touchdowns and two seasons of over 1,750 yards rushing later and the LJ pick is no longer questioned.

Currently, the Chiefs find themselves in a similar position as 2003. They have a Pro Bowl running back coming off a severe injury, the nature of which could affect the rest of Larry Johnson's career. The Chiefs also drafted a running back when many thought they would focus on other positions. Drafting Jamaal Charles in the third round gave me a similar feeling as when LJ was drafted - Interesting but didn't we have bigger needs?

I slept on it. I talked with people here. I became much, much comfortable with this pick. In fact, a few days removed from the draft, I'll contend this was the best pick the Chiefs could have made at the time.

The Chiefs' running back situation in 2007 did not end well. The team was performing emergency surgery at the end of 2007 - trying to keep enough parts working together just to barely function. Without Larry Johnson in the lineup, the Chiefs' lack of depth was exposed. Doesn't the idea of Jackie Battle playing in the NFL sound a bit ridiculous now?

Perhaps not the "third down" back he's being billed as (although he'll play that role with the Chiefs for now), Jamaal Charles showed the ability to shoulder a large workload late in his college career. Charles finished his 2007 season with 258 carries and 1,619 yards.

Jamaal Charles may not be ready to be a 20-25 carry a game running back but he doesn't have to be right now. He'll compliment Larry Johnson quite well and I predict he jumps Kolby Smith on the depth chart rather quickly.

But like Larry Johnson was to Priest Holmes, don't be surprised if Charles gets the opportunity to start and picks up where LJ left off. He has the talent to do just that.

As fickle as the running back position can be in the NFL, and this is a cliche, but you really can't have too many good ones. Picking Jamaal Charles in the third round of the 2008 draft may turn out to be a franchise saver, just like Larry Johnson turned out be.


Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 12, 2007

May 2, 2008 12:54 am
I totally agree with your analysis and Charles but not with LJ. I don't think he'll be the starter but instead Jamaal and Kolby will start. Last yr he said when he came into camp that he could help the ol with his running style but he didn't. Some said he could have played in last 2 games but wouldn't. I don't think he's gonna like the competition for playing time.Theres been alot of post saying we should trade LJ and CP has said they can't till next yr because of his contract.but either way this team will turn alot of heads when they take the field.   GO Chiefs!!

Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 14, 2006

May 3, 2008 2:49 pm
I think Charles is insurance in case LJ goes down again. How ironic since LJ replaced Priest Holmes (University of Texas) and now we have another rb from Texas. Another thing about Charles is he ran track in the spring at UT instead of lifting weights. He could easily put on another 15-20 lbs of muscle. The guy was a beast in the 4th quarter last year. I remember in the late 90's how bad the Falcons fell apart when Jamaal Anderson got hurt, he cam eback the next two seasons but was nothing compared to what he was before.  Some people say he was drafted to help return kicks/special teams, I don't think we spent a 3rd rd pick just for that.   

Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 3, 2006

May 3, 2008 7:25 pm
<table width="800" class="mcct_container"> <tbody> <tr class="mcct_header"> <td>  </td> </tr> <tr class="mcct_body" valign="top"> <td> I think Charles is insurance in case LJ goes down again. How ironic since LJ replaced Priest Holmes (University of Texas) and now we have another rb from Texas. Another thing about Charles is he ran track in the spring at UT instead of lifting weights. He could easily put on another 15-20 lbs of muscle. The guy was a beast in the 4th quarter last year. I remember in the late 90's how bad the Falcons fell apart when Jamaal Anderson got hurt, he cam eback the next two seasons but was nothing compared to what he was before.  Some people say he was drafted to help return kicks/special teams, I don't think we spent a 3rd rd pick just for that.    </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
Jamaal only ran track his freshman year he decided to work on football his sophmore year instead...


He was definitally a beast in the fourth quarter last year (expecially in the Nebraska game 216 yards....in the fourth quarter, and the Oklahoma State game where he took over in the fourth quarter and brought us back from 21 down with 10 mins left...

as for everyone talking about his "fumble problems" he fumble the ball alot last year due to an injury to his arm against TCU... once that healed completely he seemed to hold onto the ball alot better

Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:79
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 22, 2007

May 3, 2008 8:23 pm
Actually SteveDeberg....The Kansas City Chiefs drafted Jamaal Charles was because Larry Johnson might end up getting traded

Larry Johnson is injuried prone with injuries with Hamstring and Ankle and foot problems

Larry Johnson is getting ready to turn either 29 or 30 this year

The reason why the Chiefs kept Tony G was because he said he wanted to be a Kansas City Chiefs his whole career

Tony G only has like 2 or 3 years left in him and he is going to end up retiring as one of the best Tight Ends in NFL History


For Larry Johnson ....I think he is going to get traded before the trade deadline

I also being hearing that the Green Bay Packers are still looking for a starting RB and the Chiefs and Packers are in Trade talks but they are like way off on a deal to send Larry Johnson to the Packers and send a 1st and 2nd round draft pick in next years draft

That is the reason that the Chiefs drafted RB Jamaal Charles out of Texas in the 3rd round

Do the Chiefs See Jamaal Charles as a Future #1
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 3, 2007

May 3, 2008 8:36 pm
So tell us Gooey, was it Mike Mc Carthy or Herm Edwards that called your red phone and gave you all this insight?  I am glad you are on top of the breaking stories, otherwise the rest of Chief Nation would have to rely on purely false information, written by some idiot with a keyboard!