|
Since you weren't specific about what I'm supposed to be delusional about here, I'll have to guess that you mean Chavez Ravine is better than Angels Field at Anaheim. I suppose that the Anaheim ballpark may somehow be better in this way or that, I've been to the Anaheim ballpark, it is very nice. But, as I noted the Dodgers draw 4 mill per year to Chavez, so it's tough for me to say for sure that Chavez Ravine is a better park. As for the other baseball parks on the West Coast, Jestes, you are certainly the one on drugs if you think that the Anaheim ballpark is even half as nice as either AT&T or Safeco Field, I've been to both those fields many times, and Anaheim is a sandlot by comparison. I also happen to think that Petco in San Diego is better than Anaheim. Actually, the Rapid Transit arrives right at the Park in Oakland, way easier than any arrangement Anaheim has, the 57 is a parking lot as you may well know. But as I said earlier, noone goes to Oakland anymore.
The only park on the west coast that Angels field is better than is the one in Oakland...and noone goes there anymore. The Mariners, the Padres, the Giants and yes even the Giants-fan murdering Dodgers have a nicer facility than the Angels, 4 million per year at Chavez Ravine can't be wrong.
.......................................................................................................................................
Dude............You need to put the bong down. Your becoming delusional.
|
