| |
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
|
|
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 6, 2007
|
|
Who would you guys rather have at the helm of the offense this year for Cal? Nate Longshore or Kevin Riley. Longshore was having a solid season until he got hurt in the Oregon game, and Riley played very well in the Oregon State game and the game against Air Force. Personally, I'd like to see Longshore start next year because he has two years of experience. I think that Tedford should go with the more experienced QB in a Cal offense that will be much younger than it was last year. We lost Stevens, Jackson, Hawkins, Jordan, Forsett and two offensive linemen.
I really like Riley though. He's a very scrappy player that reminds me somewhat of Tony Romo. His touch on the long ball was great this year, and he evades pressure in the pocket very well.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:May 21, 2007
|
I also think Longshore's experience is a strong point for him, but he kind of lost my favor last season. He started out tremendously, throwing 7 TDs to 2 INTs in the first few games. One thing I really like about him is that he has a very strong arm. But after that injury, something happened to him. I know he had a chipped bone that was hurting him to put pressure on, which definitely affected his throwing, but what if something mental happened? I really question his judgment after some of his throws, especially against UCLA.
I like your comparison of Riley to Romo (partially because I'm a Cowboys fan lol). I agree that he is scrappy. I like his mobility a lot, it is something that Longshore really lacks (did anybody else burst out laughing when Tedford called a QB sneak for Longshore last season?). I think generally Riley has good decision-making, with one major lapse of reason happening in the Oregon St. game. Other than that, I didn't see anything out of Riley that I didn't like. Personally, I would wait and see how Longshore's ankle holds up in practice. If he shows any sign of pain, play Riley.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 29, 2006
|
I like Riley all the way. He may have less experience than Longshore, but he has some, and he has looked good in the opportunities he's had. Also, by utilizing Riley now, we'll have more continuity for the next couple of years, and maybe we can finally make our run for the Roses.
Riley all the way. Nate is the experienced backup.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Aug 30, 2006
|
|
Great post. I've been thinking about this myself. Longshore started the season very well, and when things are going good he looks great. However, he doesn't seem to play as well in close games and throws a lot of untimely INTs. On the other hand you may say that he played well at the beginning of the year because he was healthy, and his performance in the latter half of the year suffered due to the ankle injury. It was painfully obvious that when he came back from the injury he was not 100%, because you could see he could not step into his throws. Thus he had to rely only on his arm, which is good, but it cannot compensate for not being able to put weight on the ankle and stepping into the throw. The result? Under throwing the ball and weak throws that get picked off. In my opinion, Tedford should have stayed with Reilly after the Oregon State game, despite the brain fart, until Longshore was really ready to come back.
With all that said, I really don't know who should start this year. I think they both will do fine. I'm more concerned that Montgomery left and Best is still injured. Hope we have a solid running back to start the season. And I'm sure we will. Depite ESPN and all the other Network "experts" that think Tedford is just a quarterback genius, he is amazing at getting top tier runningbacks that many never heard of. Ech, Arrington, Lynch, Forsett, now Best (OK Best was highly touted), and the list goes on.
Looking forward to a great year and talking to you all on the Boards!
Roll on you Bears!!!!!!
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 15, 2007
|
Good Thread...
I am 100% behind Kevin Riley...he earned my trust in the Oregon State game, and just outpreformed Longshore against Air Force...I really like Riley's ability to move around in the pocket and feel the pressure...he's got a strong arm, and great accuracy.
GO!......BEARS!.............GO!.................BEARS!!!!
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 6, 2007
|
|
The great thing about this QB battle is that the compition should drive both Longshore and Riley to get better and work harder. Whoever wins the battle, has my upmost trust. I still believe in Teddy and whoever he chooses, I'm cool with.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:75
Level:Pro
Since:Aug 25, 2006
|
|
Longshore 1 TD in his career in the 4th quarter. Interceptions in the 4th quarter need both my hands and one of feet to add em up.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:95
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 6, 2007
|
|
Wow a pretty unanimous vote for Riley. I guess all those ints against UCLA, USC, and Az..St. made us all lose a bit of faith in his late game preformance. I must admit, this seasons preformance reminds me a bit of Joe Ayoob.
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
QB Battle! Riley or Longshore?
|
Reputation:4
Level:Amateur
Since:Mar 30, 2008
|
|
Riley! He seems to have more passion to win!
|
|