powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall? Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 18, 2006

May 10, 2008 9:56 pm

In my opinion...

... YES!

The biggest knock on Chris Williams was the fact that he was injury prone.  Let me say this... The Bears were WELL AWARE of the injuries sustained in college and felt comfortable enough that they wouldn't be a problem.  He missed NO TIME due to injury in college and played well.

He is a technically sound Tackle (think Orlando Pace out of college)... Extremely smart... and steps up against challenges.

Here's a big thing to me... WIlliams only allowed 2 SACKS in the last TWO years in the very strong SEC.  Follow that much skill and PRIDE in what you do with our strength coaches who are well-renown for being one of the best groups in the league...

... and you can see why I feel the way I do.

I wasn't sold on Mendenhall.  He is a product of my alma matar, but he came from a system that EMPHASIZED the run option and used many run schemes and draws to open up the run game.  The Bears will not be employing any of that to win and will more than likely use a more traditional approach to running-- Straight at you!

Williams is the better choice.

Thoughts?

*** This is just a comparison of Williams and Mendenhall, not knowing that Forte would be the second round pick***


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 22, 2008

May 10, 2008 10:02 pm

This years draft the Bears needed a OT more than a RB reason why they may have overlooked Mendenhall.

Forte will be a solid RB just needs to push Cedrick Benson harder to get more carries.

The question I have is that I do not remember Bears drafting a QB something that I thought was a complete miss on there part.

 


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 25, 2006

May 10, 2008 10:20 pm
The Bears made the right pick.  Williams gives the Bears the option to move Tait back to the right side and that will be a huge boost to the offense. 


Don't forget, the Lions also needed a running back but they had the good sense to draft an OT in the first round as well (Gosder Cherlus) and go after a RB later................Kevin Smith in round 3. 

The Panthers surprised many with the selection of Jonathan Stewart at #13 but then traded back into the first round to take Jeff Otah.

I think the only reason the Steelers took Mendenhall is that by the time they were on the board there weren't any top OL left.  This draft had a lot of quality OL at the top but it also had a lot of depth at RB.


The Bears made the safe pick but it was also the right pick. 



Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 10, 2006

May 10, 2008 10:49 pm
Not only was it a solid pick it was the right one. I would think having a solid line in front will make the job of developing a QB so much easier. Why it may not turn him into a franchise QB but it should make a mediocre QB very effective, and likewise for the running game. While it is only one position and for the near future will upgrade two. I wouldn't mind to keep drafting those line positions until we are young and rock solid.

Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:82
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 4, 2007

May 10, 2008 11:21 pm

Even though the Bears drafted three offensive linemen they still need to sign at least one veteran to that offensive line.   Right now, we are looking at a offensive line of Williams, Tait, and Kruetz for sure with two open spots.   Starting more than  two rookies  on the same line is risky.

I say pick up another veteran starter.  He doesn't have to be a superstar, just a legitimate NFL starter.   Then we could have St. Clair and one of the other  rookies as backups

Then maybe the running game will get some holes and our quarterbacks will get some time to throw

I am also rooting for Orton as starting QB.  He Has a 12-6 record as a starter, playing with no offensive line.  I think he has a stronger arm than people give him credit for,  He certainly lit it up at Purdue.  He has done everything they have ever asked him to do; and has earned his shot

 

 


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 5, 2007

May 10, 2008 11:48 pm

Definetly yes, our OT situation was borderline desperate and that had to be our #1 priority entering this draft. If we drafted RB first our O-line would be worse off today and that effects the entire offense. You need a strong line not only to run the ball but to pass the pill as well.

Forte will be solid for us just as Mendenhal will be solid for Pittsburgh.


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 5, 2007

May 10, 2008 11:54 pm
The question I have is that I do not remember Bears drafting a QB something that I thought was a complete miss on there part.

 

Well, the Bears went into this draft wth a lot of holes to fill, they needed depth for the O-line, RB, WR, safety and QB. The problem was that this draft class was rather poor for QB's and once the Bears filled their (2) most glaring hiles at OT and RB, the best prospects were lonfg gone.

The only sure fire impact QB was Ryan, you can keep Henne, Flacco, Booty, Johnson, Woodsen, Brohm ect..... none of them will probably be much more then backups in (3) years anyway and the Bears already have (2) of those on the roster in Oron and Grossman....


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 27, 2008

May 11, 2008 10:24 am

I think they made a good choice with an Offensive tackle.  It filled an immediate need.  Maybe our line will look something like this  Chris Williams, John St. Clair (he knows the system and did a decent job when Terrence Metcalf couldn't produce), Olin Kruetz, Robert Garza (can still produce at a high level, but theres a couple of Rookies in the waiting), John Tait.

And I think Forte in the second was a steal to fill our second.  I would love to see Kyle Orton and Marty Booker playin on Sunday, glad to see Marty back, and have always liked Kyle. 

GO Bears!!!


Was C. Williams a better pick then Mendenhall?
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Dec 6, 2006

May 11, 2008 10:57 am

When comparing Mendenhall and Williams in retrospect  the Williams pick was the better pick given the need we had in our line.  Williams will fill that need...to what extent I do not know.  Technically sound is a very good thing in college but when you hit the NFL I believe you are going to need a little more of a mean streak.  When watching him at the combine there was a guy with great feet, athletism, and fluidity...but he lacked something.  I guess what I saw that he lacked was a fire to show that he is willing to try to make some one on a opposing defense apart of the turf if you know what I mean.  Maybe in their interviews they saw a fire in the kid and I surely hope that he does have it.  Or I can hope that a little of Olin rubs off on him.  But that really is my only concern about the pick.  The talent is there but is the mind set. I am going to say that the jury is still out on the kid and time can only tell if he is going to be a better pick than Mendenhall.  

But another way to look at this would also to be the upside potential of both players.  if both players go on to be perennial all pro's both who would we want?  I would definitely vote for Williams given the importance of the p