powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
2008 iowa status Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

2008 iowa status


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 8, 2008 5:05 am
Hey just a curious buckeye fan here wanting to know more about the teams around the big ten. I am hoping for the big ten to re-establish itself as a true power. While I dont buy the crap that the big ten is weak I do know ive seen better days of football for our conference. I have read things saying that PSU, illinois, wisky, and MSU are bringing back pretty good teams and I know OSU is as well, as for michigan i def think they can crack the top 25 depending on how well RR builds the team this summer the talent is still there.. Just hoping for a little input from you all.

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 6, 2007

May 8, 2008 9:36 am
Blatent attempt at boosting your rep score. Go away, Buckie.


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 8, 2008 4:41 pm
i couldnt care less about a rep score just looking for input but if you like a rep score thats cool i guess

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 6, 2007

May 9, 2008 9:06 am
Go pick up a Big Ten preview magazine this fall. I would think that is the better route than posting 12 different "How's your team??" threads on a message board. Sorry, bro....I just think this is a ridiculous thread.


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 14, 2008 4:11 am
Oh my bad dude I thought the purpose of the site was to interact with fans and exchange opinions on sports. What was I thinking? I guess I'll just start posting team bashing threads... that seems to work for everyone else.

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 6, 2007

May 14, 2008 4:04 pm
You posted literally the same exact message 11 different times on 11 different message boards. There's a difference between asking a pointed question about a particular subject or interacting with people about this and that and just spamming boards with "Hey, how's your team looking?!?" messages.

Now go back to your other 10 messages. Surely you've found a friend somewhere else.


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 14, 2008 11:06 pm
I posted 10 messages asking the same pointed question because there are ten other teams in the big ten that i was curious about, that is not spam that is "researching" if you will. Its not my fault that thus far you're the only idiot that has taken offense to it.  Always amazes me that when I read a comment or thread I dont like I just ignore it but everyone else (like you) gets worked up. if you dont like my thread stop reading it!

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 6, 2007

May 15, 2008 9:18 am
Oh, you're doing "research." Well then, if you're conducting "research" then I guess it's okay. Can you do us all a favor and provide us with your final report after you've finished your "research" on Big Ten football teams? I didn't realize you were going so in-depth with such concrete analysis. Are your results going to be published somewhere or are you going to write an article for a magazine? Are you doing some interviews with the players and coaches?

Beat it, clown.


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 18, 2006

May 15, 2008 12:58 pm
If you're truly conducting research, wouldn't an unbiased publication work much better than going to a team's message board where everyone is talking up their favorite team? Agree with Clem, this is a bit silly.


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 15, 2008 5:50 pm
well hawk thus far you and clem are the only people to complain about it. I said "research if you will" meaning it is for my own personal interest not because im writing some article (dumba** clem). Im gonna go out on a limb and say clem has nothing good to say about his team that is why he avoids the subject. He is just another idiot poster who comes onto the boards to talk sh*t instead of sports. I guess he feels like a bada** because he talks sh*t on the internet, I dont know, I dont really get it. "beat it clown" What are we from the 50's there clem? How about you kick rocks a**clown.  Im not concerned with iowa anymore obviously their fan base is too stupid to understand simple posts. Its amazing how guys like clem and hawk are the only ones that dont understand a simple thread. Michigan, illinois, penn state, michigan state, purdue, and wisky didnt mind. Then again those teams actually win maybe their fans arent bitter eh clem? Maybe I'll come back in a couple years when iowa is actually kinda important and then all the sudden you'll probally want to talk about how good your team is. I wont hold my breath.

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:78
Level:Pro
Since:Dec 24, 2007

May 16, 2008 6:54 pm

Yeah, Clem! How about you "KICK ROCKS!"

LOFL!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just love it when these posters get all huffy & puffy and say the most ridiculous things. 


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:May 24, 2007

May 17, 2008 1:08 pm

SOMEWHAT BIASED FAN RUN DOWN:

Iowa seems to have a lot of question marks at a few key positions (RB, CB, QB,OL). Last year was obviously a rough year with all the injuries, suspensions, and ultimately inexperience on offense.

RB: Our top two RBs are gone due to graduation, our #1 going into the spring game went home and  we were left with walk-on Paki O'Meara and incoming JUCO transfer Nate Guillroy (small, lot of speed/power). Shonn Greeene (a beast IMO, great size, good speed, HUGE power) is returning after taking a year off to his grades together, but will he physically be ready after a year off?  Also, we have two promising RBs in Brinson and Hampton coming in the new freshman class.  We'll probably see a tandem effort, if not three being rotated until we find someone who can learn the offensive schemes the quickest.  So far, it seems that Paki O'Meara has the nod...for now.

QB: Let's be honest, JC got rolled up and smoked last year.  He was sacked more times than any other QB in the nation.  Throughout the year he seemed a little shell-shocked in the pocket and and couldn't quite get into a rythm.  However, he seems to be a smart player in the fact that he knows not to force a pass and give up the fooball.  I just wish he would throw it away every now and then...but part of his inconsistency wasn't his fault; dropped passes and an inexperienced OL played into that as well...

OL:...however, the entire OL is returning and now has another year of experience under their belts.  We saw a lot of starters go down early in the season last year, so they were thin and being shuffled aroung a bit.  But, one would expect to see much-improved OL play this year.  This is where we might start to see what this offense is really made of.  If the line can actually protect the passer and open up some lanes for the RB's, we could have a hell of an offense, BUT AGAIN, that all depends on how the OL gels.

WR/TE:  We're stacked, watch out!  Tony Moaeki (#1 TE) and Andy Brodell (#1 WR) are coming back after both went down with season ending injuries during the Wisconsin game (1st B10 season game).  The emergence of Brandon Meyers and DJK was a breath of fresh air, but still a little green.  Trey Stross has a lot of talent and Paul Chaney JR and Colin Sandeman have a lot to put into the offense as well.  Put that group together with Erik Campbell (Michigan's former WR coach) and you have a bunch of WR's and TE's that will move the chains.  BUT, that all depends on weather or not Jake Christensen can actually settle down and get a pass off.

DL:  The DL will be our anchor this year as we return both Mitch King and Matt Kroul at DT.  Both of these guys are work horses and should build a pretty impressive NFL resume by the end of their senior seasons.  The loss of Brian Mattison and Kenny Iwebema to graduation hurts, but Adrian Clayborn and Christian Ballard are both up and coming DE's that have showed that they can create some havoc in the backfield.

LBs:  The losses of Mike Klinkenborg and Mike Humpal to graduation, like I'e said earlier, hurts, but AJ Edds looks to be next man in line and he is a tackling machine.  Also, Jacody Coleman got to see some PT last year as a freshman and had quite a few shining moments as well as Jeremiah Hunter and Pat Angerer.  Everyone should be pretty solid @ LB.

S:  Brett Greenwood got the nod last year at free safety as a TF.  He got burned a few times, but what TF hasn't, but he showed that he can defend the pass and bring the lumber when needed.  Harold Dalton will probably get the start at strong safety, good speed and has a little more experience as a junior.  Jayme Murphy didn't see too much PT @ his respective position as a freshman, but did very well on special teams as a true freshman (that's how B. Snaders, C. Greenway. A. Hodge, and S. Considine got noticed).

CB:  We lost both senior starters Charles Godfrey (drafted) and Adam Shada (sucked) to graduation.  It hurts to lose experience, but I tend to be a little optimistic about Amari Spivey returning to the hawks.  He took a year off from Iowa to get his grades together as well and had a hell of a season at his community college.  I hope he hasn't lost a step.  Bradley Fletcher looks to be the starter on the other side of the field.  he saw a lot of action near the second half of the season and had two 10+ tackle games in a row.  Again, both players are young, but have shown that they are able to compete.  They just need a little more experience to achieve their potential.

Overall, the defense looks pretty solid, even more so than last year IMO.  I think that if the offense can keep the defense off of the field long enough though, we should be able to win the close games.  With a favorable schedule early on, it should give the Hawks a chance to gel before going to Pitt.  The Pitt game should really let everyone know where the Hawks truly are.  Then, it's B10 season.  No Ohio St, No Mich.

NW - W

@ Mich St. - L

@ Indiana - W

Wisconsin - W (close one, but I'll call it a win)

@ Illinois - L

Penn St. - W (close one, but I'll call it a win)

Purdue - W

@ Minnesota - W

As long as we can pull off the win @ Pitt and protect the home field, this should be a pretty solid season.  I see us going anywhere between 8-5 to 11-2 (including bowl game).


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 12, 2007

May 18, 2008 9:03 pm
thanks for the good insight 420

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:May 24, 2007

May 19, 2008 10:21 am
ALWAYS DOWN FOR TALKING HAWKEYE FOOTBALL!


2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:43
Level:Rookie
Since:Aug 18, 2007

June 7, 2008 8:03 pm
iowa is looking better this 2008 8 year with some good recruits they are possibly trying some new playing quarterbacks and it will be hard to replace damian and younge

2008 iowa status
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:May 24, 2007

June 9, 2008 11:39 am
Losing the top two running backs is always going to be a hard blow. However, the Hawks have done more with less in