powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
chad johnson and roy williams Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

chad johnson and roy williams


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 13, 2006

May 8, 2008 1:02 am

First I wouldn't give up more than a first rounder for CJ - he's a great reciever but not really what they need.  He's a smaller stretch the field guy and they need a bigger physical reciever.  That's why fitz would have been perfect and Bouldin still would be. also CJ is 31 years old and a major headache.

Second I can't see Roy Williams being traded.

Third - Reggie Brown WILL NOT BE TRADED.  why not? - 8 MILLION DOLLAR CAP HIT!!!! with only 2.9 offset by salary.

The only trade I could see happening would be for Bouldin but it might take both 1st rounders to do it and thats an awful lot to give up.  Everybody keeps saying that we should trade lito and a first but if thats all that Detroit or Arizona wanted the deal would already have been done.


chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:May 1, 2008

May 8, 2008 9:14 am
Everybody keeps saying that we should trade lito and a first but if thats all that Detroit or Arizona wanted the deal would already have been done.I agree 100%.  Didn't even think of it this way, but I agree completely.  Good post 'i bleed green'

chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:89
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 20, 2008

May 8, 2008 2:34 pm
I think for those who say that you need great Wr's. Look at the Giants. I am yes they have plax but after that I think our Wr's our gonna be ok. But would rather see them get roy before chad just because he's younger but either would work for me

chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 21, 2007

May 8, 2008 2:55 pm
Giants might be a bad example man.... Plaxico 12 TD's. Toomer-the dude's like 70y/o and he's still getting almost 60 rec a year. Then i think your gonna see a lot more looks at 3rd, 4th and 5th WR's Steve Smith, Tyree, and Manningham next year.


chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:89
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 20, 2008

May 8, 2008 4:17 pm
but besides the td's plax numbers werent eyepopping. Toomer is good but to old and we have a deeper group overall I think. I think defense wins championships.

chad johnson and roy williams
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Mar 27, 2007

May 8, 2008 6:08 pm

"I think for those who say that you need great Wr's. Look at the Giants. I am yes they have plax but after that I think our Wr's our gonna be ok. But would rather see them get roy before chad just because he's younger but either would work for me"

What are you trying to say? were the Giants receivers good or bad?

If your saying Plax isn't a number 1 your crazy he is way better then any of the Eagles WR.

If your saying he is but the rest aren't, well we don't even have 1, So What is the deal?

Not trying to be a dick but i was very confused with your post.