powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
 Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Ryan Mallet


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 16, 2008

May 5, 2008 10:22 pm

Is the NCAA correct in not allowing Ryan to play this year?

 

Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 16, 2008

May 5, 2008 10:24 pm
The NCAA needs to change their rules when it comes players changing schools because their coach was fired or retired.  The NCAA does not make the coaches sit out or penalize them in anyway so why should the players be penalized.  The NCAA has lost touch with reality.

Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 4, 2007

May 6, 2008 11:02 am

Your right hogwildfan5 it is a shame that coachs are aloud to just leave and nothing happens. Worse then that some of them even have aq buy out clause and walk away with a bundle of money.

I thunk they need to change the rules, if a coach up and quits the kid should be able to transfer and not lose any eligibility. Its not fair to the kid when the coach that left made promise's and now they won't be kept, he would not have gone to that school if not for those promisse's. he should be able to transfer.


Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 25, 2006

May 6, 2008 2:32 pm

I have always thought the rule of sitting out for a year was silly.  A guy transfers to another program for whatever reason and has to sit on his hands for almost 15 months. Stupip!


Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 25, 2006

May 6, 2008 2:34 pm
Stupid! I can't spell stupid, but I can use it in a sentence.

Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 16, 2007

May 6, 2008 3:26 pm
I agree that this rule needs to be changed. The coaches example is very true and if the they dont change it for the players than they need to make a rule that prohibits the coaches because that is what is getting this all messed up

Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:96
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 16, 2008

May 6, 2008 5:58 pm
It makes me wonder what is the reasoning behind this rule.  I am sure that they had a good reason but like everyone has stated it needs to be revised.

Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 3, 2006

May 7, 2008 11:35 am
I agree that if a player wants to transfer because of head coaching changes, there should be some type of rule that would allow it in certain circumstance.  I mean, really....I wouldn't want to be a pro-style passing quarterback who's head coach quit or was fired and then find out I was getting a new coach who used 70% running plays.  That's not fair to the player.  But then you have to look at what could happen if they made it a blanket rule.  You might end up having over half the team wanting to transfer to follow their former head coach.  I understand that they have to have this rule or players who felt they should be first string but were sitting on the bench would be transferring all the time.  But they need to make exceptions when there is a change in head coaches and perhaps certain position players don't fit into the new scheme.  They really need to look into it. 

Re: Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 23, 2007

May 7, 2008 12:34 pm
I think you have several good points. The rule is in place to prevent poaching of high profile talent. Most institutions and athletic departments will be honorable, but as we find out every year, certain programs either through the coaches or boosters cheat their way to glory.

SMU was so bad in the 80s that they got their program terminated for a number of years. If certain kids could move without restriction on a coaching change, then every year we would get a reentry draft for the next season. It would foster even more cheating than we have now.

I don't like it that college athletics allow the schools and the coaches to advance themselves for money and keep the athletes tethered to the school in a sort of indentured servitude, but at some point we have to allow the kids to be amateurs and hope that a free education will be enough. With stars like Lebron James, Moses Malone (for all you old-timers), and others, basketball players already bypass the college ranks to go straight for the money. The NFL uses the collegiate ranks as an unsponsored minor league, so that is why the NFL has all these ridiculous rules about early entry into the draft. They don't want to damage their minor league, so the indentured servitude continues.

I don't know the solution, but I agree that in certain situations there ought to be consideration given for the circumstances a kid finds himself in. Mallett ought to be one who is considered. There is a whole lot of money tied into the current setup, so I don't expect any changes anytime soon.

Re: Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Nov 25, 2006

May 9, 2008 3:23 am
There are already rules on the books about  trying to steal talent from other programs.  When New Orleans was ruined by Hurricane Katrina, coaches around the country  tried to steal certain players from Tulane. The NCAA stated then that it was not allowed but turned a blind eye to it considering the circumstances. Coaches and staff are not allowed to induce a kid to transfer. If the kid makes the contact that is different. As far as the rules go,  a player should be able to transfer as long as he/she is in good standing.  Most players sit for much longer than one year. If a player transfers in Jan., he sits for 20 months. That is criminal.

Re: Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jun 21, 2007

May 9, 2008 7:48 pm

Why is it that a kid that transfers from  BCS school to a FCS school can play immediately and one that transfers from BCS to BCS cannot? Why is it a kid can be released from his commitment if there is a coaching change, but a player that is already on the team cannot?

Some of the rules that the NCAA has in place are baffling if not straight up insane. I understand why there are rules and I understand that there needs to be some way to keep it an even playing field. However, it seems that some schools are more equal than others, but that is for a different argument.

I personally like the previous argument about why doesn't a coach get penalized for leaving and going to another school. Think it would change things if a coach had to sit out a year before he could coach at another BCS school? I bet it would stop the muscial chairs of coaching changes in the NCAA. If a coach wants to advance in his profession why shouldn't a scholar athlete be able to advance in his chosen vocation?

We all ask why and we never get any real answers, so I guess it goes without saying ....why ask why?

Later!

bdh


Re: Ryan Mallet
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Jul 4, 2007

May 9, 2008 8:03 pm
You make some real good points there bldehw, to good thats why the ncaa won't do what you have just said. It makes to much sence.