powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
How day 1 should have gone. Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Olympics  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

How day 1 should have gone.


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      



How day 1 should have gone.
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Aug 5, 2007

April 26, 2008 9:53 pm

Disagree.

 

Otah is more of a work in progress then Williams. Otah probably wouldn't be able to start opening day at LT so Tait wouldn't be able to move back to his natural position at RT.

By drafting Williams we upgrade the O-line at (2) positions.

Brohm, geese... I wouldn't reach on this guy in RD2 especially with holes to fill at other positions. He may be a good QB someday but he probably isn't going to develop into a Franchise QB so it would have been a wasted pick in round 2.

Forte was the better pick based on our needs since Bumson probably isn't going to be the same after his shattered ankle and we all seen how bad he was healthy, just imagine how much worse he will be with a bum leg !!!!    Adrian Peterson isn't the answer and Garrette Wolfe is merely a scant back for us. Forte has good speed, ellusiveness and is an acomplished blocker so he was a better choice in my opinion.

  


How day 1 should have gone.
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 13, 2007

April 26, 2008 9:54 pm

Totally Disagree.  The Bears did ok.   I believe in following your own board, regardless of how others may grade a player out.  Williams is pro ready.  Those concerned about hia strength, the Bears have the best strength coah in the league in Rusty Jones.  If they believe Forte is superior to Rice due to size, then I'm fine with that.    Both Brohm and Henne had arm strength issues. 

I want the Bears to address the QB position with Josh Johnson.   His accuracy and TD/Int ration is off the charts and he played under Harbaugh in a pro style offense.   


How day 1 should have gone.
-
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Apr 1, 2007

April 26, 2008 10:05 pm
Disagree the only 2 things I question are Williams over Albert simply because of Williams short arms. Also not trading up to try and grab Brohm. If they needed to move up 15 or so slots. We knew that wasn't going to happen though. I'm ok with Williams but I LOVE THE FORTE pick.

Does anyone know if it is possible to cut Benson (finanical would it make since or are we still stuck with him)??


How day 1 should have gone.
-
Reputation:94
Level:All-Star
Since:Feb 13, 2007

April 26, 2008 10:09 pm
Albert, as a T, only projected to the right side.  Williams is a natural LT who is pro ready and perfectly graded for his draft slot.

How day 1 should have gone.
-