powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  MMA  |  More
CBS College  |  High School  |  Mobile  |  Shop
  TV Listings
  Talent Bios
  Site Network
  Get CBS College!
  Find your School
  Football Recruiting
  Football Rankings
  Football Stats
  Hoops Recruiting
  Hoops Rankings
  Hoops Stats
  Baseball Rankings
  Baseball Stats
  Video Highlights
  Featured Application
  Mobile Web
  Alerts
  Applications
  Video
  Home
  NFL
  NCAA
  MLB
  NBA
  NHL
  Fantasy
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

diaz?
View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


diaz?
-
nuke420
Reputation:76
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 7, 2007
April 23, 2008 11:51 pm
Score: 74
Log-in to rate:
i know he spent 7 yrs. in the minors does anyone see y??? we need a DH, i think Matt Stairs proved he can be a more valuable ball player.  Games like tonight just seem like were throwing away wins, to finish 3rd or worse, in division.
See replies · Reply · Permalink

diaz?
-
stevieb
Reputation:97
Level:Superstar
Since:Sep 4, 2006
April 24, 2008 12:33 pm
Score: 94
Log-in to rate:
Actually I think Stairs as a full time DH is a perfect fit, the problem is they released Reed and Kept stewart, bad move.  They should just bring up Ling and throw him in Left and let him grow.  Stewart is a good role filler but he shouldn't be playing full time anymore.
See replies · In Reply to... · Reply · Permalink

diaz?
-
nuke420
Reputation:76
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 7, 2007
April 24, 2008 2:11 pm
Score: 72
Log-in to rate:
yea i agree, Stairs needs his nights off now and agian also, but i young gun like Lind can play nightly, or when needed.  Stairs can play DH, 1B, Outfield, and 3rd, love whoever signed him, now if we can get these other bums to come out, haha. STAIRS FOR SS!!!
In Reply to... · Reply · Permalink