With the 2007 football season over, its easy to see that no team was "dominant."
Every "real" team had at least 2 losses. No team was impressive the whole year. I laugh on here because people say "You lost to a 4 loss Tennessee team." Well guess what, almost every team lost at least 3-4 games, so is that actually a compliment to lose to a 4 loss team?
I think alot of these off-season arguments need to be spared. Everyone fan of any given team can spout out something negative about any fan from any other given team at any time.
Everyone needs to shut up, and stop sippin the Haterade.
I agree. No team was dominant last year. Yeah, 10-4 Tennessee and 6-6 South Carolina. Just as bad as 2-10 Stanford and 8-5 Oregon. Or 9-4 Illinois. A loss is a loss, regardless of who you lose to.
Agreed, maybe this thread will be the first step in helping people realize that no team really proved better than any other. We HAVE to wait until next year.
Caleb King and AJ Green will be huge for us. I don't think Green's enrolled yet so we'll probably have to wait until Georgia Southern to see how he plays.
King was an absolute beast when he played for Parkview. He played against my high school team in 2005 in the playoffs and ran all over them. It'll be good to see what the other early recruits can do: Richard Samuel, Dontavius Jackson, Tavarres King, RS Walter Hill, RS Israel Troupe
Every "real" team had at least 2 losses. No team was impressive the whole year. I laugh on here because people say "You lost to a 4 loss Tennessee team." Well guess what, almost every team lost at least 3-4 games, so is that actually a compliment to lose to a 4 loss team?
I would agree. And is this the begining of an era with more parity strung out over conferences. Personally, I thought this was brewing for a while. There are still a few very "rich" teams that continue to be the favorites but by and large they are getting bit more often and by a deeper pool of teams. It is getting harder and harder to go start to finish.
