Partners:   NCAA.com   CSTV.com   MaxPreps.com  
    
powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
 Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Auto Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  SPiN  |  MMA & Boxing  |  More
Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

mens game changing


View Message BoardViews:      


mens game changing
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 6, 2006

March 24, 2008 5:14 pm
With Joel Wilfried Tsonga and Novack Djokovic playing so well, and Roger and Nadal playing the way they are. Do you think the top 10 tennis players are going to change? I think Nadal has many more good years ahead of him. However could Roger be in danger of losing his number 1? What do you think?

mens game changing
-
Reputation:99
Level:Superstar
Since:Oct 29, 2006

March 24, 2008 8:56 pm

You pose some interesting questions.  However, you have to look at several facets of the game before taking into consideration a new #1 player in the world. 

1.  Who can beat Nadal on Clay? 

This is something that has to be answered from within the clay court season.  This time around Canas is going to be seeded and I think Canas or Nalbandian pose the biggest threat to Rafa on Clay. 

Novak can play on Clay, but I don't know about Tsonga.  Given his slow hard court dominance at the Aussie and Pacific Life Open, this could be a surface where he can also dominate on. 

2.  Who can be Roger on Grass?

I don't know that anyone can.  Rafa had him beat last year in the finals and let it slip away.  The Americans (Roddick, Blake, Young, Fish, Queery and Isner) could all give him a run if they got him early in the tourney, but the closer you get to the finals with Roger I think the more likely you are to choke by his name sake at Wimbledon. 

Roddick, Fish and Isner all pose the biggest threat as well as Igor Andreev and Karlovic.  All of these guys possess the huge serve it takes to win at Wimbledon if you don't have Roger's game.  Isner just out of college is my favorite to beat him (Federer), but how much has a college kid played on grass? 

If you can answer those two questions, then you may be able to take a look at who really stands a shot at finishing #1 this year.  It won't be Tsonga by all accounts, but Novak is good enough on all surfaces and has to be a favorite at the US Open this year.....I think if he can reach the finals at the French and the Semi's at Wimbledon coupled with a great run at the US Open and some of the other hardcourt summer series tournies, then Novak has the best chance to win it all and finish #1 this year. 

With the tennis ranking system the way it is, it's hard for players to really say they finished #1. 


mens game changing
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 6, 2006

March 24, 2008 9:34 pm
I agree with Tsonga on clay I really want to see what he can do. Awesome post!

mens game changing
-
Reputation:50
Level:Pro
Since:Apr 5, 2008

April 8, 2008 10:14 am

The mens game will be as it is for the next three to five years.  The only change will be the new technology .  Mens tennis has always changed every five or six years and will continue to do so. 

You tennis purist know this, so why do you sit back and say nothing.

parker john


mens game changing
-
Reputation:85
Level:All-Star
Since:Mar 20, 2008

April 10, 2008 10:34 pm
I think there could very possibly be a major shake-up in the rankings this year. Nadal has an incredible amount of points to defend on clay. He won every clay tournament he entered last year except Hamburg, where he reached the final. One slip up to any of the clay court specialists in an early round or to Djokovic or Nabaldian in any round  at a masters event will close the gap between Djokovic and Nadal to nothing. Nadal  already lost points at the Pacific Life and Miami, but  so did Djokovic. Federer didn't have many points to defend because of his losses to Canas  last year. Roddick's win over Federer was big for him, as were his wins over Djokovic and Nadal at Dubai. Andy  won't reach higher than 3 or 4 at best, but will get some points on clay(he had none last year, skipping most of the clay court season with a bad ankle and losing to Andreev in the first round of the French), and he will probably improve his Wimbledon results where he forgot to close Gasquet out. Federer is going to concentrate on winning the Olympics, as will Djokovic, and I think the short turnaround to the US Open will keep either of them from making the final. Federer is losing his fear factor advantage, much as Sampras did at this same age. He's still the best ever IMO, but we will see more early exits and he has tons of points to defend. Nadal is due to lose at the French and seems to be having increasing leg problems from his style of play. He's GREAT, but he gets no easy points. Somebody unexpected wins the French, Roger wins Wimbledon, but Andy makes the final or semi's when he runs into Federer, Andy wins the US Open as he's not going to Bejing, and whoever wins the Masters Cup finishes #1 by a hair.