Partners:   NCAA.com   CSTV.com   MaxPreps.com  
    
powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
 Sports News
Home    Fantasy    NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Auto Racing  |  Tennis  |  Horses  |  SPiN  |  MMA & Boxing  |  More
Mobile  |  Shop
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community
 

Nevada who?


View Message Board ·  Go to Team PageViews:      


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 10, 2007

December 26, 2007 11:11 am
Wow, what a showing.  Do you want to talk MWC vs the WAC now?  Probably not, since the MWC is 3-0 and the WAC is 0-2 in bowl games.  You guys got whooped by New Mexico!  Ouch!  And yes, they are from the MWC.  Welcome to our conference.  Did you say some quarterback is going to be a Heisman?  I think you were thinking of BYU's Max Hall, right b/c I know you weren't talking about your quarterback.  You guys got shut-out and blown-out at the same time, way to go!

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 5, 2007

December 30, 2007 3:30 pm

Your Basketball team lost to BSU


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Feb 26, 2007

December 31, 2007 8:33 pm
 That would be the Nevada Wolf Pack jerky. Glad this year is over but very much look forward to a more prosperous '08.

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 10, 2007

January 2, 2008 12:33 pm
Hey, nice comeback.  I knew coming on here today that that would be the great comeback.   Let's see, that just doesn't seem to match what was done or I should I say "not done" by the WAC in the bowls this year.  Thanks for not showing up.

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 10, 2007

January 2, 2008 12:36 pm

That last comment was for Wes.

Mr. Howl,

"...that's the Nevada Wolf Pack jerky.."  What is that supposed to mean? 


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 2, 2006

January 2, 2008 2:22 pm
Can you say "exposed"?

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:93
Level:All-Star
Since:Sep 5, 2007

January 3, 2008 8:48 pm

I knew coming on here today that that would be the great comeback

It took you 4 days to get up enough nerve to check on responses? You must have really been shook up by that loss.


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 11, 2007

January 3, 2008 9:14 pm
Congrats on your wins MWC.  You guys won we lost, there's no denying that.  As smiles said in another post, the only thing worse than a sore loser is a sore winner.  You guys had a great bowl record but didn't do anything at all to contribute to the overall status or standing of the MWC or Non BCS conferences in general so I'm not going to kiss your feet.

I mean seriously, look at your wins this bowl season.  Utah wins over an interim led service academy in Navy, BYU beats an interim led UCLA, New Mexico beats some "Nevada who" team" at home, TCU beats Houston, and Air force loses.  None of those wins are over anyone impressive. 

Again, congratulations but come on, you can get off your SEC cloud and quit looking down on the WAC because we had a bad bowl season and you had a mediocre one.  

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 2, 2006

January 4, 2008 1:21 pm

GW, obviously you need to understand the context bud. The reason you are getting flack from MWC fans is because you WAC yahoos have been running for 2 years now about how your conference has surpassed the MWC. That obviously is not true. Hawaii pulled the wool over everyone's eyes this season.

I gues I'd take 4 mediocre bowl wins over the WAC's 1 medicore bowl win any day. See I can play that game too. Your one bowl win came against an interim led Georgia Tech team, while playing to what was overwhelmingly a home crowd for Fresno. That win was just as unimpressive as our wins, the difference is we got four of them. If you're going to start discrediting every bowl victory for anyone playing against a team with an interim coach, you might as well only count about half of any of the bowl wins every season as legit. West Virginia was playing with an interim coach and it didn't seem to hurt them any. Michigan was playing with a lame duck coach and the played just fine. I'm sorry but you can't just assume that because UCLA and Navy were playing with interim coaches that that had anything to do with their loss. perhaps the teams that beat them were just better.

Honestly GW, if you don't like MWC fans running it and being sore winners in this case, perhaps you should tell the rest of you WAC chronies, including your commishioner to stop running it about how your conference is better than ours, when it obviously is not.


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 11, 2007

January 4, 2008 5:25 pm
Backer that's because we were better than you the last two years, and you guys are better than us this year, plain and simple. 

I gues I'd take 4 mediocre bowl wins over the WAC's 1 medicore bowl win any day. See I can play that game too....

I admitted defeat and that you were better than us, and i admitted you did better than us this bowl season so what else do you want me to say?  It's like you get off talking about your "accomplishments". 
This whole year we were talking about how much better the WAC was because we thought they were but we found out they weren't and we(me and the posters that i admire, not the sour apples) have admitted that you were better this year.  Plus 99% of our(again, the top BSU posters) "yapping" about how much better the WAC was took place on OUR boards, not yours.  We'll talk about whatever we want on our boards and it's your decision to come on it and be a little baby.  I'm not going to tell my BSU "chronies" to stop yapping on our own board. 

Oh yeah and the commissioner...Next time i happen to run into Karl Benson at the grocery store I'll tell him to quit proclaiming our conference as the better one. 

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 13, 2007

January 5, 2008 1:04 am
GW good post and BYU backer you are very intelligent and you arguments have sound reasoning but hey, just what are you trying to prove? I agree that the MWC was much better this year. I'm glad we are ( all the WAC teams are getting a cut of the bcs "booty) and not the MWC. And I'm looking forward to '09 because I think The Wolf Pack will take that game againts your beloved Cougars. Don't get your panties all bunch  now backer it's just  a prediction I have that right to make. I might end up being wrong and if it happens to turn out so, well then it's always 2010 will take ya. Hey backer just curious but did you know that mormans believe that if you do everthing right, that you can earn the highest place in heaven....becoming your own God. Isn't that the lie the serpant told Eve to make her sin?

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Jan 11, 2007

January 5, 2008 8:35 pm
hey man i appreciate the input but as a member of the LDS (aka mormons) church I would suggest keeping religion off of the sports boards.  Backer, I, and other LDS members would be happy to discuss this with ya off the board but let's keep it sports. 

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:98
Level:Superstar
Since:Nov 26, 2006

January 6, 2008 6:33 am
The LDS church is a joke, but this is a sports forum, not religion. As far as Nevada who.. that was quite unnecessary. The WAC has been the better conference over the past 2 years and the MWC was better this year. Not much else can be said. So I suggest you stop running your trap and just enjoy it now. And I'll look foward to rooting for the WAC and against the MWC next year. Go Pack.

Nevada who?
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 2, 2006

January 9, 2008 5:12 pm

Nev and Skilz, first of all, I'm not sure how you figure the WAc was better than us the past 2 years. I mean every single power ranking I've seen shows the MWC ranked higher than the WAc despite BSU's BCS game last year. Are all the experts wrong about that? Should we just take you WAc fans word for it? The fact is the WAC has never been better than the MWC. Power rankings have shown the MWC higher for 9 years running now boys. But go ahead and believe what you want. Convince yourself that you're better. Anyone with a brain knows otherwise.

Nev, I'd love for your beloved Wolfpack to come show us that you're better next year. Oh wait, you guys ran from that game scheduled next season. Hmm, I guess you won't get your chance.

Finally boys, like GW said your bigotry towards the LDS Church has no place on this board. However, I'd be glad to give you the true information, that you have obviously skewed in a different forum. BTW Skilz, I love how you say "The LDS Church is a joke" but then come back with this is a sports forum, not religion. Well which is it dude? You can't have it both ways. What you said was just as bad as what Nev said. You sir are the joke bigot boy.


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:90
Level:All-Star
Since:Dec 13, 2007

January 9, 2008 10:30 pm

BYU  nice argument but it has its faults. First off I stated my opinon and you just stated your opinon. You can not prove me wrong and I can not prove you wrong. It is what you value to define your definition as stronger. In my opinion If we have 4 bowl teams and one goes to a BCS bowl, then we are the stronger league. I mean really you can not possible compare the 2006 feista bowl with the (smirk) the "Las Vegas bowl"....Not even close. Besides I'll take being the weaker league anyday as long as we keep bringing in the money with those bcs births.

Finally I am not a bigot. I will gladly discuss anything you want to on these boards including the FACT that the LDS church believes you can work your way to becoming your own god that populates your own planet.  If you did not know that ,BYU, then you know less about the cult that your following, and should start asking some questions to educate yourself.


Nevada who?
-
Reputation:92
Level:All-Star
Since:Oct 2, 2006

January 10, 2008 2:11 pm

Nev, first of all, please do not pretend to know more about the LDS church than I do. I have been a member of that church for 33 years, served a mission, and have held several leadership positions within the church. You stating "If you did not know that, BYU, then you know less about the cult that your following, and should start asking some questions to educate yourself." is an absolute joke. I love how anti-Mormon, bigots like yourself, just love to pretend that us poor, confused Mormons, don't know anything about our religion and we need you anti-Mormon idiots to tell us all about it. Trust me dude, I can 100% unequivecally guarantee you that I know more about true LDS doctrine than do you. So no little boy, I don't need you to point out what I do and do not believe.

Like I said, this is not the forum for a religious debate, but it is pretty obvious from your statement of "The LDS Church believes you can work your way to becoming your own God that populates your own planet" that you don't want to discuss it, but rather try to prove that all us poor Mormons are in a "cult". Grow up kid! If you really want to discuss Mormonism, I'd be glad to do that in a civilized manner, but I learned along time ago that there really is no use discussing it with someone who has already made up their mind and really only has one objective and that is to belittle and try to disprove someone else's faith. That my boy is the definition of an Anti-Christ. Good job!

Now about the MWC. You see Nev, where you are wrong is that this is not my opinion against your opinion. This is the opinion of you and a few of your know-nothing WAC buddies against the opinion of every power poll every issued on the subject. Do you get it? This is not only my opinion, but fortunately for me, my opinion is also backed up by fact. Just because one of your teams made it to a BCS game last year, does not automatically qualify you as a better league. In fact, many national media members argued last season that BYU was a better team than BSU at the end of the year. I guess noone will ever really know that for sure. Your conference is a joke. You have 1 or 2 decent teams every year, that run the table because they play piss-poor non-conference schedules and then roll all the rest of your barely DI teams in conference. Man, if only we could play the schedule BSU and Hawaii have played the last 2 years, then we would be talking about back to back BCS bowl for BYU.


Nevada who?
-
Level:Amateur
Since:Sep 8, 2007

January 14, 2008 1:39 am

BYU Backer - As a Pack (and WAC) fan, I tend to agree with you on your point that top-to-bottom the MWC is superior to the WAC and has been for years.  Last year Boise St. had a great team, no question about it, but this year people were comparing Hawaii with that team and I had to chuckle because Hawaii struggled to win many games against weak opponents whereas other than a couple close games at Wyoming and at San Jose St., BSU was destroying their opponents, including Oregon St. and Utah.  Taking Georgia with the points in the Sugar Bowl was pretty easy money, IMO.

Anyway, not to sound like like a WAC basher, but at least I'm pragmatic about it.  All this talk about which conference is better reminded me of an idea I had many years ago: wouldn't it be cool if the NCAA could set up a "bragging rights" weekend each a year which would pit major and mid-major conferences against each other, with say, the top five or seven teams from each conference? (an odd number to prevent ties).  I don't know how the logistics of scheduling would work out, but at the end of each year, the teams could be ranked in order of finish within their respective conferences.  The following year, for example, the PAC 10 1 through 5  would play the SEC 1 through 5, or any other BCS conference on a rotating basis.  Likewise the WAC, MWC, Conference USA and Mid American teams would play against each other, rotating each year.

That would certainly settle a lot of arguments, and besides it would be great fun to watch,  yes?


Nevada who?
-
Level:Amateur
Since:Sep 8, 2007