powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community | Help
TenAce Anyone Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  Racing  |  Tennis  |  Cycling  |  MMA  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Horse Racing
 Collegiate Nationals
 Message Board
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 '08 Football Preview
 Football Rankings
 Football Stats
 Hoops Recruiting
 Hoops Rankings
 Hoops Stats
 Video Highlights
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community

BlueCollarIT

TenAce Anyone

Name: Private | Gender: M | Member Since December 13, 2006
Current Level: Superstar | Email: Private
Favorite
Teams
Blog Home

Parity in Pay

Posted on: May 6, 2008 4:23 pm
Edited on: May 6, 2008 4:24 pm
 

Parity in pay is an interesting question. Why shouldn't the women get paid as much as the men? At Rome this week the prize money is not the same. At Wimbledon they do get paid the same. Let's also ask the question why don't the doubles tournaments pay twice as much as the singles tournaments? I don't have the figures at hand but I am going to assume that twice as many people are involved in doubles. They should be paid twice as much. Instead they are paid much less.


The figures for Wimbledon are as follows - Men and Women Singles champions get 750,000 pounds apiece (don't ask me to convert pounds) . Men and Women Doubles champions get 230,000 pounds apiece. The mixed doubles champions get 92,000 pounds. Keep in mind the doubles have to split the prize between them.


Why the disparity in pay? I am guessing that more people follow the men's tournament than the women. I don't doubt that more people watch the singles than the doubles. I don't have attendance figures at hand. Do they publish stats on attendance figures broken down by women's and men's matches. Personally, i would rather watch the Bryan brothers play than Federer. I would rather watch Henin play Serena than Nadal versus Ferrer. I am used to swimming upstream. What do the numbers say? If the attendance for the women overall equals that of the men then a change in pay would be warranted. If not then a change in pay would be a crime. The one who draws the most should get paid the most. Any opinions out there?

Category: Tennis
Reputation: 96
Level: Superstar
Since: Mar 20, 2008
Posted on: May 6, 2008 7:54 pm

Parity in Pay

This has been a hot topic issue for a long time. It started in the seventies with Billie Jean King and has continued through last year with Venus Williams threatening to boycott Wimbledon rather than defend her title if the women didn't receive equal pay. A good argument against this is that the men have to win seven 5 set matches in 2 weeks while the women still play three set matches like every other tournament only woth a day to rest in between. From that viewpoint, the men play 35% more tennis on average in a grand slam tournament and should be compensated accordingly. On the other hand, and I think this hand holds all the cards, prize money is based on advertising dollars, sponserships, and viewership. We in America tend to forget that more than almost any other sport, tennis is a GLOBAL sport. The women do generate as much viewership and have at least as much sponsership as the men, especially in the Euro markets. The attendence at the actual events don't generate near as much income as tv and sponsers. Then, of course, gender equality is politically incorrect when it isn't recognized. I am an avid tennis player and watcher and I would rather watch almost any men's match than any women's match(no dissing of Henin whose success against bigger, stronger women is a testament to her mental fortitude and talent). My wife, also an avid tennis player(ranked #10 in KY her senior year of high school) will watch any women's match and only select men's matches. Each to their own. But this does probably reflect demographics that affect advertising. Women 25-49 are a coveted group to reach for advertisers and women's tennis does that. Of course, 120 years ago when tennis first started being played competitively, women were considered the fairer sex and unable to withstand the rigors of 5 set matches as they weren't really athletes. The year end Championship for women used to be  best of  5, nut that was changed in the early 90's. Given the amount of training that women do and that I do consider them athletes, I would like the to play the same 5 set format as men at the Majors. Either way, I am in favor of equal prize money.



About TenAce Anyone
When Yogi Berra said 90% of the game is half mental he must have been thinking of Tennis
Recent Blog Entries
TenAce Anyone
CBS Sports Blogs
TenAce Anyone's Tags