powered by Google  
  Track your favorite teams and players.
Free membership, Register Now
Already a member, Log In
 


Community
Newsletters | Help
Changing Lines Sports News
  Home   Fantasy     NFL  |  MLB  |  NBA  |  NHL  |  College FB  |  College BK  |  Golf  |  More CBS College | High School | Mobile | Shop  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Horses Home
 Live Racing
 Youbet Update
 Carryovers
 Free Selections
 Contests
 U. of BET
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 Cycling Home
 Results
 Standings
 Stages
 Teams
 Riders
 Message Board
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Arena Football
 Auto Racing
 Boxing
 CBS College Sports
 CBS Sports TV
 College Baseball
 College Hockey
 Collegiate Nationals
 Contests
 Fantasy FB Today
 Fantasy News
 Horse Racing
 Message Board
 MMA
 Olympics
 Poker
 Soccer
 SPiN
 Tennis
 Tour de France
 Video
 WNBA
 Women's Coll BK
 World Sports
 
 Site Index
 
 
 CBS College Sports
 Coll Sports Tonight
 Get CBS Coll Sports
 XXL - Watch Now
 Talent Bios
 Schedules
 School Sites
 
 
 Find your School
 Football Scoreboard
 Football Rankings
 Football Passing Leaders
Football Rushing Leaders
Football Highlights
Volleyball Rankings
MaxPreps High School Sports
MaxPreps TV Schedule
 
 
 Featured Application
 Mobile Web
 Alerts
 Applications
 Video
 
 
 Home
 NFL
 NCAA
 MLB
 NBA
 NHL
 Fantasy
 
Community Home | My Profile | My Blog | Groups | My Settings | My Account | Member Search | Blog Search | About Community

Erin Brown

Changing Lines  RSS - Changing Lines

Name: Erin Brown | Gender: F | Member Since August 10, 2006
Current Level: Superstar | Email: Private
Favorite
Teams
Blog Home

What's the point of no-trade clauses, really?

Posted on: July 3, 2008 6:04 pm
 
Time for a rant.

Before the trade deadline in February, the yet-to-be-installed owners Oren Koules and Len Barrie of the Tampa Bay Lightning were chiming in on what GM Jay Feaster needed to do regarding player movement and contracts. Among the top priorities: get Dan Boyle signed to a long-term deal, pay him handsomely, and heck, throw in a no-trade clause. The message was clear Boyle was to remain in Tampa.

Barely four months later, the ink is still drying on the paperwork which puts Koules and Barrie in an official capacity, and the pair is looking to dump the offensive defenseman. Rumors have been running rampant for the past week or so, and despite all the denials by team management about the desire to trade Boyle, the defenseman has stepped forward to say he's been asked to waive his no-trade clause.

Like a couple of spoiled kids, it appears Koules and Barrie would rather get the newest, shiniest player in the lineup, than use the one they locked up months ago. That can't be a good feeling for Boyle.

This may be misconstrued as an attack on the Tampa Bay Lightning, but they aren't the only guilty party. Ottawa confronted Wade Redden a couple of times last season to waive his clause. Toronto tried to get several of its players -- including (but not limited to) Mats Sundin, Pavel Kubina and Bryan McCabe -- to do the same without any success just before the trade deadline. The Leafs are still nagging Bryan McCabe to waive his clause.

Redden moved on to New York City, Kubina played himself back into the good graces of the Leafs and Sundin has the opportunity to explore his options with other teams. But for Boyle and McCabe, it has to be pretty awful to realize the front office would rather see them gone than on the ice, for whatever reason, and only they can make it happen.

I guess it is kind of ironic this post comes a day after applauding the Detroit Red Wings for how the organization treats its players. The actions of Tampa Bay and Toronto are a complete 180-degree turn from those of Detroit, and maybe that's why success has been fleeting for those franchises in recent years.

Call it well-deserved karma from the hockey gods.